Market report: 5 arbitrage windows and where the sharp money went
Book-to-book price gaps, which leagues the sharp money actually shows up in, and whether backing the crowd covered.
Line movement told a clear story this week. Across 205 games on the board, 5 markets are currently priced far enough apart between books to lock a return, and the cheapest hold available averages out well under what a single-book bettor pays.
Open arbitrage
| Game | Market | Return | Books |
|---|---|---|---|
| WVU at UVA | moneyline | +104.73% | Caesars / Fanatics |
| ASU at KU | moneyline | +38.25% | Fanatics / Caesars |
| OHIO at USA | moneyline | +5.20% | DraftKings / Fanatics |
| BOS at TEX | moneyline | +2.86% | bet365 / DraftKings |
| TEM at TOL | moneyline | +1.57% | Caesars / Fanatics |
Where the sharp action is
| League | Divergent games | Reverse moves | Steam |
|---|---|---|---|
| WNBA | 100% | undefined% | undefined% |
| NFL | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| MLB | 60% | 55.6% | 73.3% |
| NCAAF | 28.6% | 60% | 0% |
Fading the crowd
| Ticket share | Games | Cover rate |
|---|---|---|
| 50–60% | 5 | 80% |
| 60–70% | 1 | 100% |
| 70–80% | 0 | 0% |
| 80%+ | 5 | 60% |
Cover rate is measured on the side holding the ticket majority. A number within a point or so of 50% is noise; it takes a persistent gap across thousands of games before "fade the public" is a strategy rather than a slogan.
Assembled by the rule-based generator from a snapshot of the board. Prices move; the figures above are what the market showed when this was written.